Opinionated architecture – blue prints without the middleman

While at the Spring Experience this past week, I was delighted to learn a few things.

I got a good look at an OSGI environment, discovered what it felt like to turn rapidly in a circle on a cigarette boat doing well over 40 knots, and was introduced to the term “Opinionated Architecture”.

To my new understanding, an opinionated architecture, or framework, or solution, is one that proclaims a mandatory set of conventions in various things such as directory structure, configuration and code artifacts, naming conventions, and patterns of use. Due to the specification of these and possibly other things, the adopter of the solution will benefit from the use of the naturally occurring wizards and reusable templates that exemplify the mandatory bits and pieces. More than the traditional “blue-prints” offered by some, the essence of the available and proper use of the
opinionated solution depends on the erasure of alternative paths lest disaster strike.

This is not a trivial course to take. The author of the solution must have effective and real knowledge of the problem domain addressed by the solution – hopefully informed by enough failures that the successful path as declared is completely valid to the limits of the conceit of the solution.
For instance, web frameworks such as Grails provide rapid application development to those who agree to adopt the programming paradigm made possible and pushed by the elected framework. The result is a religious fervor adopted as those who share the faith and bend to the will of the higher, more-knowing, technological power are validated by their successes and spurred to greater adoption and recognition of the awesome power of the solutions’ prescription.

Caution: some wordiness follows:
The topic of the effect of poor planning and proceeding with lack of effective guidance down the enterprise architectural path was touched on in a BOF on high-performance Spring apps that took place late Friday night. (After the keynote filled with Monty Python references) During this talk, it was made clear that only experience can fulfill the needs of the architect challenged by a huge problem. What was also revealed is that humans frequently fail to avoid making the same mistakes numerous times even when presented with compelling alternatives. Old habits die hard it seems.

I am (tonight) of the opinion that unless your solution infrastructure mandates a path of best results and guides you to a proven successful state, you are more than likely to wander into the woods of competing best practices overgrown with budget constraints, lack of innovative and experienced resources, and just plain lack of understanding. It is therefore better to adopt a winning solution set whole-heartedly and when all the Kool-Aid is gone, agree to be dictated to by a benevolent dictator who has the right stuff.

The experience of a journeyman or artist is really very similar. In classical Ballet, for instance, the student rarely questions the validity of the techniques demonstrated by the Maestro leading the class/company. There is an element of necessary blind faith in the chosen path and the guides you choose to follow down it. Once one determines that the task at hand is indeed Ballet, one really has no choice but to turn out hips, point feet, and develop habits of posture that will sustain them through the most grueling choreography – for it will surely come and in spades. The student/apprentice is not well served to strike out on their own until a mastery is attained of the subject matter *through experience* that validates new choices and proves that through their adoption, greater success is to be found. The opinion therefore exhibited must be one based on hard-earned experience and still based predominately on a foundation made real and sustainable by the experiences of many others.

As it happens, I have watched the growth of OpenSpaces over the last many months with the skeptical eye of a – er skeptic – not realizing that the purpose of the framework is not only buzzword compliance and the implementation of popular development practices, but in the context of GigaSpaces and what is offered to our prospects and customers, a truly opinionated framework that takes the vastly flexible GigaSpaces infrastructure and service implementations and distills *the* successful use of it all into enforceable use of the Spring programmatic approach and technologies, thus empowering the neophyte and thought-leader alike with the unmistakably opinionated path to success.
The beauty of the switch to the prescriptive and formulaic from the free and often flailing style, is the stunningly rapid improvement in adoption rate, early prototyping successes, and sustained production-systems that continue to reinforce my growing certainty that we got our bit of it right this time.

Yes, OpenSpaces and by our support of it, GigaSpaces, has become an opinionated architecture/solution. As more and more tools and samples become available, and more wizards like my somewhat primitive, yet highly effective Project-creator, are built and offered, that fact will be obvious to all and joyfully so to the initiates and practitioners of the Linearly Scaling Aplication Arts. (The LSAA)

Write Once, [our way]
Scale Anywhere

Cheers,

Owen.