Contents
2. Why You Might Need a MongoDB Alternative
3. Top Alternatives to MongoDB
4. MongoDB Capabilities and Alternatives
5. Last words about alternatives to MongoDB
Are you looking for the most effective way to store and process your data? Do you need a platform that offers high availability and scalability without affecting performance? Or are you looking for a data solution that efficiently handles modern application requirements?
Let’s explore some of the well-known solutions, starting with MongoDB.
Introduction to MongoDB
MongoDB is a popular document database that is used for cloud-native applications, content management, IoT, and web services, all of which need large volume, unstructured and semi-structured data handling. MongoDB is open source, supporting a free community server, while their Enterprise and Atlas versions are paid. MongoDB uses a flexible schema for storing data and groups data into documents and collections. Each record in its non-relational, or NoSQL database is a document described in BSON, MongoDB’s binary representation format of the data. Applications can then retrieve this information in a JSON format.
This platform is built on a distributed, horizontal scale-out architecture, providing resiliency through replication. It is available as a fully-managed cloud service and can be deployed on self-managed infrastructure. MongoDB allows flexible schemas so users can easily change data models without much downtime, and also offers an efficient indexing method. MongoDB is quite popular for building robust and scalable web applications, ecommerce, to store demographic and biometric information, and for many other services that require efficient handling of large volumes of data.
Why You Might Need a MongoDB Alternative
However, if you are looking to power demanding digital applications that consume real-time data stored in multiple systems of record, MongoDB won’t be enough. MongoDB limits the size of a document to 16 MB and the number of nested levels to a maximum of 100 levels. In addition, MongoDB users often experience high data consumption due to denormalization. Since MongoDB only offers eventual consistency by default, it may not be suitable for applications that require strict ACID transactions.
Top Alternatives to MongoDB
Some of the MongoDB alternatives include Redis, Apache Cassandra, Amazon DynamoDB, Apache CouchDB among others. Each of these alternatives to MongoDB have their pros and cons.
For example, Amazon DynamoDB, a fully managed service, offers virtually unlimited storage, handling large amounts of data, supporting both vertical and horizontal scaling. DynamoDB ensures high availability and durability. However, users have noted that this fully managed service has fluctuating costs and it lacks MongoDB’s advanced querying capabilities.
Apache Cassandra, an open source project is used across various industries such as IT, advertising, healthcare, transport and finance. It has added Storage Attached Indexes (SAI) and vector search capabilities to v5.0. Cassandra offers eventual consistency by default, with high availability in distributed environments. However, performing at scale often requires Cassandra to denormalize data. This system uses CQL (Cassandra Query Language), which can be difficult for developers accustomed to SQL, and also requires ongoing maintenance and monitoring to ensure optimal performance.
Redis can be employed as a cache, a NoSQL database, or a message broker. Its high performance and scalability make it a popular choice for application caching scenarios. While its in-memory data structure supports a range of data types, including hashes, sorted sets and more, data consumption is high because Redis uses denormalization to improve read performance.
While the single-node, document-oriented database Apache CouchDB is free, operating costs vary according to the cloud service where you run it. Its distributed architecture’s capabilities are not as strong as MongoDB’s more dynamic schema that supports nested and complex data structures. Its multi-master replication feature allows multiple database instances to synchronize changes bidirectionally, making it suitable for applications that require offline access or have geographically dispersed users.
MongoDB Capabilities and Alternatives
Let’s take a look at MongoDBs specific capabilities, with regard to the data demands of digital applications. Since MongoDB lacks a service tier, high latency and low concurrency result. Shared data is duplicated in multiple documents, leading to update and sync issues. Limited cache is a known issue, slowing down performance especially with complex documents. This database has no embedded, event-based data integration capabilities. MongoDB requires manual conflict resolution in distributed environments, which increases application logic.
A data solution that efficiently handles modern application requirements
To achieve all the necessary capabilities that digital applications require, you’ll need a more robust solution – a recommended solution is a Digital Integration Hub (DIH). This out of the box data hub accelerates application delivery, enhancing the performance, availability, and scalability of front-end applications that rely on real-time data. A DIH, such as GigaSpaces SmartDIH integrates data from multiple diverse backend systems to power complex, mission-critical applications where high availability, high performance and resilience are paramount. It offers high availability and supports sharding.
Here’s a comparison between MongDB and SmartDIH:
Event-driven (Real time, CDC)
Data Decoupling out of the box
24x7 (Availability and Resilience)
Real-time (Data Freshness / CDC)
ACID compliance / Transactional support
Optimized for Hybrid Deployments
High Performance
Low Code Data Services OOTB
Automatic failover
Data Consolidation of Multiple Sources

Strong support
especially in hybrid and real-time scenarios
designed for complex integrations

Limited support
Requires additional configuration
Requires additional configuration
Depends on the specific setup
Varies according to parameters
Very limited capabilities
partial (requires configuration)
Requires custom aggregation and ETL processes
While both MongoDB and SmartDIH use scale out architectures, a DIH also offers the following capabilities, such as processing data and enabling microservices. A proven DIH such as Smart DIH offers many other advantages – all out-of-the-box, such as:
- Extreme in-memory processing, ultra-low latency and near-linear scalability
- Fully compatibility with relational data models, enabling full integration of legacy infrastructure and SQL knowledge
- Embedded data integration including Change Data Capture (CDC)
- Storage optimization and minimized downtime
- Fast and simple creation of new digital services with a centralized data layer
Last words about alternatives to MongoDB
Although MongoDB can be installed on-premises, this deployment requires significant management overhead, including installing and configuring MongoDB servers, replica sets, and sharded clusters. You will also have to institute regular back-up procedures and institute a disaster recovery plan. To ensure optimal performance, you’ll need to monitor and tune your database. Keeping your MongoDB installation up-to-date with the latest security patches and features is also on your plate, unless you select Mongo’s Atlas, a cloud-based MongoDB service.
In contrast, a DIH solution such as SmartDIH, can be deployed on cloud, on-premises and in hybrid deployments, with minimal overhead for the organization. Smart DIH offers extreme in-memory performance, autonomous elasticity and scale, business policy-driven storage, co-located microservices, low code data source integration, built-in data integration and always-on services; key features which make this solution suitable for an extensive range of use cases. SmartDIH enables you to quickly launch highly demanding real-time apps easily, at scale and cost-effectively.